Is Hell Just?
Written by Vladimir Moss
Of all the Christian dogmas, none has elicited more perplexity over the
centuries than the doctrine of eternal punishment. Thinkers from Origen to
the contemporary ecumenists have tried somehow to get round the
unequivocal statements of the Gospel that those who will stand condemned at
the Last Judgement will be cast into the eternal fire, from which there will be
no deliverance unto the ages of ages. In attempting in this way to deny the
eternity of the torments of hell, these thinkers have employed a number of
1. The Argument from God’s Compassion.
. According to this, it is contraryto God’s nature to consign anyone to hell for ever. After all, what father
would divide his children into sheep and goats? What bridegroom would
wish eternal torments on his bride? And even if some such could be found,
what has this to do with God? Is He not perfect love and infinite mercy?
The commonest answer to this very common perplexity is to say: God is
not only perfect love, He is also perfect justice; and while in His love for
mankind He wishes that all men should be saved and come to a knowledge of
the truth (I Timothy 2.4), the fact remains that very many "resist the truth" (II
Timothy 3.8), and so cannot be saved, becoming subject to the full severity of
His justice. The satisfaction of justice is an absolute demand of the Divine
Nature, not because God is a bloodthirsty tyrant seeking revenge in a human,
fallen manner, - God is not subject to any human passion, - but because evil
and injustice are utterly alien to His Nature. As St. John of Damascus puts it:
"A judge justly punishes one who is guilty of wrongdoing; and if he does not
punish him he is himself a wrongdoer. In punishing him the judge is not the
cause either of the wrongdoing or of the vengeance taken against the
wrongdoer, the cause being the wrongdoer's freely chosen actions. Thus too
God, Who saw what was going to happen as if it had already happened,
judged it as if it had taken place; and if it was evil, that was the cause of its
being punished. It was God Who created man, so of course he created him in
goodness; but man did evil of his own free choice, and is himself the cause of
the vengeance that overtakes him." (Dialogue against the Manichaeans, 37)
Now such an answer was quite sufficient for generations of Christians
brought up in the fear of God, and believing in the goodness of His
judgements without presuming to understand them. For them the fact of
impenitence, and its link with Divine judgement, was as self-evident as the
link between penitence and Divine mercy. And if there were still many things
they did not understand, this was only to be expected. After all, how can the
pot be expected to understand the potter (Romans 9.20-21)? The judgements
If we question God’s judgements, then we are implicitly placing ourselves
in judgement over Him, as if we could be more just than He. What folly could
be greater than this? “Shall mortal man be more just than God? Shall a man be
more pure than his Maker? Behold, He put no trust in His servants; and His
angels He charged with folly. How much less in them that dwell in houses of
clay, whose foundation is in the dust? (Job 4.17-19). “For who shall say, What
hast Thou done? Or who shall withstand His judgement? Or who shall accuse
Thee for the nations that perish, whom Thou hast made? Or who shall come
to stand against Thee, to be revenged for the unrighteous men? (Wisdom of
It was by meditating on such passages of Holy Scripture that our
forefathers guarded themselves from highmindedness. We are not so humble
today. In proportion as our pride in ourselves and our capacities has
increased, so has our trust in, and reverence for, the judgements of God
decreased. Our attitude is: if I cannot understand this, or if it offends my
moral sense, then even if God has declared it to be so, it cannot be so; there
Hell offends not only our sense of justice, but also our self-esteem (the two
are closely connected). Whereas the holy Apostles, though innocent of
betraying their Master, still had the humility and awareness of their profound
weakness to ask: "Lord, is it I?" (Matthew 26.22), we both absolve ourselves of
any really serious sin, and, like the Popes of old, give indulgences to the
whole of the rest of humanity. Although the holy Apostle Peter says that even
the righteous will scarcely be saved (I Peter 4.18), we consider that even
unbelievers will be saved. Perhaps a few of the worst sinners, we concede,
might be worthy of hell - the Hitlers and Stalins of this world. But is it
possible to believe that the nice, caring, enlightened men of late twentiethcentury
Speaking of hell and its eternity, St. John Chrysostom writes: - "Do not say
to me, 'How is the balance of justice preserved if the punishment has no end?'
When God does something, obey His demand and do not submit what has
been said to human reasoning. In any case, is it not in fact just that one who
has received countless good things from the beginning, has then done things
worthy of punishment, and has not reformed in response either to threats or
to kindness, should be punished? If it is justice you are after, we ought all on
the score of justice to have perished at the very outset. Indeed even that
would have fallen short of the measure of mere justice. For if a man insults
someone who never did him any wrong, it is a matter of justice that he be
punished. But what if he insults his Benefactor, Who without having received
any favour from him in the first place, has done countless things for him - in
this case the One Who was the sole source of his existence, Who is God, Who
endowed him with a soul, Who gave him countless other gifts and purposed
to bring him to heaven? If after so many favours, he not only insults Him but
insults Him daily by his conduct, can there be any question of deserving
"Do you not see how He punished Adam for a single sin? 'Yes', you will
say, 'but He had given him paradise and made him the recipient of very great
kindness.' And I reply that it is not at all the same thing for a man in the
tranquil possession of security to commit a sin and for a man in the midst of
affliction to do so. The really terrible thing is that you sin when you are not in
paradise but set amidst the countless evils of this present life, and that all this
misery has not made you any more sensible. It is like a man who continues
his criminal behaviour in prison. Moreover you have the promise of
something even greater than paradise. He has not given it to you yet, so as not
to make you soft at a time when there is a struggle to be fought, but neither
has He been silent about it, lest you be cast down by all your labours.
"Adam committed one sin, and brought on total death. We commit a
thousand sins every day. If by committing a single sin he brought such
terrible evil on himself and introduced death into the world, what should we,
who live continually in sin, expect to suffer - we who in place of paradise
have the expectation of heaven? This is a burdensome message; it does upset
the man who hears it. I know, because I feel it myself. I am disturbed by it; it
makes me quake. The clearer the proofs I find of this message of hell, the
more I tremble and melt with fear. But I have to proclaim it so that we may
not fall into hell. What you received was not paradise or trees and plants, but
heaven and the good things in the heavens. He who had received the lesser
gift was punished and no consideration exempted him; we have been given a
greater calling and we sin more. Are we not bound to suffer things beyond all
"Consider how long our race has been subject to death on account of a
single sin. More than five thousand years have passed and the death due to a
single sin has not yet been ended. In Adam's case we cannot say that he had
heard prophets or that he had seen others being punished for their sins so that
he might reasonably have been afraid and learnt prudence if only from the
example of others. He was the first and at that time the only one; yet he was
still punished. But you cannot claim any of these things. You have had
numerous examples, but you only grow worse; you have been granted the
great gift of the Spirit, but you go on producing not one or two or three but
countless sins. Do not think that because the sins are committed in one brief
moment the punishment therefore will also be a matter of a moment. You can
see how it is often the case that men who have committed a single theft or a
single act of adultery which has been done in a brief moment of time have
had to spend all their lives in prison or in the mines, continually battling with
hunger and every kind of death. No one lets them off, or says that since the
crime was committed in a brief moment the punishment should match the
"'People do act like that,' you may say, 'but they are men, whereas God is
loving towards mankind.' Yes, but even the men who act in this way do not
do so out of cruelty but out of love for mankind. So since God is loving to
mankind He too will deal with sin in this way. 'As great as is His mercy, so
great also is His reproof' (Sirach 16.12). So when you speak of God as loving
towards mankind, you are actually supplying me with a further reason for
punishment, in the fact that the One against Whom we sin is such as this. That
is the point of Paul's words: 'It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the
living God' (Hebrews 10.31). I ask you to bear with these words of fire.
Perhaps, yes, perhaps they may bring you some consolation. What man can
punish as God has been known to punish? He caused a flood and the total
destruction of the human race; a little later He rained down fire from on high
and utterly destroyed them all. What human retribution can compare with
that? Do you not recognise that even this case of punishment is virtually
endless? Four thousand years have passed and the punishment of the
Sodomites is still in full force. As His loving kindness is great, so also is His
punishment..." (Homily IX on Corinthians, 1-3. Translated in Maurice Wiles & Mark Santer (eds.) Documents in Early Christian Thought
, Cambridge University Press, 1977).
torments of hell, as a result of which we forget about them. In the world they
have totally forgotten about them. The devil convinces everyone there that
neither he himself nor the torments of hell exist. But the Holy Fathers teach
that one’s betrothal to Gehenna, just as to blessedness, begins while one is still
on earth – that is, sinners while still on earth begin to experience the torments
of hell, while the righteous experience blessedness, only with this difference –
that in the future age both the one and the other will be incomparably more
“At the present time, not only among lay people, but even among the
young clergy the following conviction is beginning to spread: eternal torment
is incompatible with the boundless mercy of God; consequently, the torments
are not eternal. Such a misconception proceeds from a lack of understanding
of the matter. Eternal torments, and eternal blessedness, are not things which
proceed from without, but exist first and foremost within a man himself. ‘The
Kingdom of God is within you’ (Luke 17.21). With whatever feelings a man
instills within himself during his life, he departs into eternal life. A diseased
body torments one on earth, and the more severe the disease is, the greater
the torment is. So also a soul infected with various diseases begins to be
cruelly tormented at its passage into eternal life. An incurable physical
ailment ends with death, but how can a sickness of the soul end, when there is
no death for the soul? Malice, anger, irritability, lust, and other infirmities of
the soul are vermin which will creep after a man even into eternal life. Hence,it follows that the aim of life consists in crushing these vermin here on earth,
so as to purify one’s soul entirely, and before death to say with our Savior,
‘The prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in Me’ (John 14.30). A
sinful soul, not purified by repentance, cannot be in the company of the saints.
Even if it were placed in Paradise, it would itself find it unbearable to remain
“Even the bodies of sinners will experience torment. The fire will be
material; there will not only be pangs of conscience, and so forth. No, this will
really be perceptible fire. Both the one and the other will be real. Only, just
like the body, the fire will be far more subtle, and everything will bear only a
certain resemblance to earthly things.” (Victor Afanasiev, Elder Barsanuphius of Optina,
Platina: St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, 2000, pp. 283, 309, 735-736).
heaven would not be heaven for the righteous as long as they knew that the
sinners were being tortured in hell. Being filled with compassion, their bliss
would be spoiled as long as there was even one sinner still suffering torment.
So God in His compassion, and so as to give His chosen ones a perfect and
unspoiled reward, will forgive all men eventually.
However, the Fathers teach that that feeling of compassion which is so
necessary while there is still life and hope will be taken away by God when
there is no more use for it. For if, as St. John of Damascus says, "in hades [i.e.
after death but before the Last Judgement] there is no confession or
repentance" (P.G. 96
, 1084B. Cf. Psalm 6.4), then much less will there be confession and repentance after theLast Judgement in gehenna. And if there is no repentance how can there be
forgiveness?
Thus St. Gregory the Great writes, in his commentary on the parable of
Lazarus and the Rich Man: "We must ponder these words: 'They who would
pass from hence to you cannot' (Luke 16.26). For there is no doubt that those
who are in hell long to enjoy the lot of the blessed. But since the latter have
been received into eternal happiness, how can it be said that they desire to
pass over to those in hell? It must be that, as the damned desire to go to the
dwelling of the elect, to escape from that place of suffering, so the just wish to
cross over in mercy to that place of torments, to bring them the freedom they
desire. But those who wish to cross from heaven to hell can never do so; for
although the souls of the just are aflame with mercy, nevertheless they are so
united to the divine justice and guided always by rectitude, that they are not
moved by any compassion towards the reprobate. They are in complete
conformity with that judge to whom they are united, and so they cannot have
compassion for those whom they cannot free from hell. They consider them asstrangers, remote from themselves, since they have seen them repelled by
their Maker who is the object of their love. So neither the wicked can cross
over to the felicity of the blessed: because they are shackled by an irrevocable
condemnation, nor the just go to the unjust: because they cannot feel
compassion for those whom the divine justice has rejected..." (Parables of the Gospel, Dublin: Scepter Publishers, pp. 155-56)
follows: "Neither are the works of faith necessary for salvation, nor even faith.
For most men have never had the Gospel preached to them, and so belong to
other faiths simply out of ignorance, because they were born into non-
Christian societies or families. The All-loving and All-just God will certainly
not judge them for that. Indeed (continues the argument in some of its forms),
all that is necessary for salvation is good faith, by which we do not mean the
one true faith (for there is no such thing), but
sincerity, even if that sincerity ismanifested in non-Christian beliefs and actions: blessed are the sincere, for
they shall inherit the Kingdom of Heaven."
However, God attaches little value to sincerity per se: "The way of a fool is
right in his own eyes" (Proverbs 12.15), and: "There is a way which seemeth
right unto a man, but the end thereof is the ways of death" (Proverbs 14.12). In
any case, if true faith in Christ were not absolutely necessary for salvation,
and one could be saved without knowing Him, then it would not have been
necessary for the Martyrs to confess Him, for the Apostles to preach Him, or
"Are you saying, then” retort the ecumenists, “that all the Hindus and
We neither assert this nor deny it, preferring to "judge nothing before the
time" (I Corinthians 4.5), and to follow St. Paul's rule: "what have I to do to
judge them that are without?… Them that are without God judgeth" (I
Corinthians 5.12-13). We know with complete certainly about the perdition of
only a few men (Judas, Arius, etc.), just as we have complete certainty about
the salvation of only a few men (those whom the Church has glorified as
saints). As Archbishop Theophan of Poltava wrote, when asked about the
salvation of the Jews: "When St. Anthony the Great was thinking about
questions of this kind, nothing concerning the essence of these questions was
revealed to him, but it was only told him from on high: 'Anthony, pay
attention to yourself!', that is, worry about your own salvation, but leave the
salvation of others to the Providence of God, for it is not useful for you to
know this at the present time. We must restrict ourselves to this revelation in
Nevertheless, when compassion for unbelievers is taken as a cloak from
under which to overthrow the foundations of the Christian Faith, it is
necessary to say something more, not as if we could say anything about the
salvation or otherwise of specific people (for that, as Archbishop Theophan
says, has been hidden from us), but in order to re-establish those basic
principles of the Faith, ignorance of which will undoubtedly place us in
Ignorance - real, involuntary ignorance - is certainly grounds for clemency
according to God's justice, as it is according to man's. The Lord cried out on
the Cross: "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do" (Luke 23.24);
and one of those who were forgiven declared: "I obtained mercy because I
acted in ignorance” (I Timothy 1.13; cf. Acts 3.17, 17.30). For our Great High
Priest is truly One "Who can have compassion on the ignorant, and on them
However, there is also such a thing as wilful, voluntary ignorance. Thus St.
Paul says of those who do not believe in the one God, the Creator of heaven
and earth, that "they are without excuse" (Romans 1.20), for they deny the
evidence from creation which is accessible to everyone. Again, St. Peter says:
"This they are
willingly ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens wereof old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the
world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: But the heavens
and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved
unto fire against the day of judgement and perdition of ungodly men" (II
Peter 3.5-7). Again, claiming knowledge when one has none counts as wilful
ignorance. For, as Christ said to the Pharisees: "If ye were blind, ye should
have no sin: but now ye say, We see; therefore your sin remaineth" (John 9.41).
Wilful ignorance is very close to conscious resistance to the truth, which
receives the greatest condemnation according to the Word of God. Thus those
who accept the Antichrist will do so "because they received not the love of the
truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them
strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned
who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness" (II
Thessalonians 2.10-12). And if it seems improbable that God should send
anyone a strong delusion, let us remember the lying spirits who, with God's
permission, deceived the prophets of King Ahab because they only
prophesied what he wanted to hear (I Kings 22.19-24).
Conscious, willing resistance to the truth is the same as that "blasphemy
against the Holy Spirit" which, in the words of the Lord, "shall not be forgiven
unto men" (Matthew 12.31). As Metropolitan Anthony (Khrapovitsky)
explains: "Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, or 'sin unto death', according to
the explanation of the Seventh Ecumenical Council (VIII, 75), is a conscious,
simply that he who bars the way to the Spirit of truth is thereby blocking the
way to the truth about himself and God, and therefore to the forgiveness of
his sins. As St. Augustine says: "The first gift is that which is concerned with
the remission of sins... Against this gratuitous gift, against this grace of God,
does the impenitent heart speak. This impenitence, then, is the blasphemy
Wilful ignorance can be of various degrees. There is the wilful ignorance
that refuses to believe even when the truth is staring you in the face – this is
the most serious kind, the kind practised by the Pharisees and the heresiarchs.
But a man can also be said to be wilfully ignorant if he does not take the steps
that are necessary in order to discover the truth – this is less serious, but still
blameworthy, and is characteristic of many of those who followed the
Thus we read: "That servant who knew his master's will, and prepared not
himself, neither did according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes.
But he that knew not, and did things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with
few stripes. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall much be
required; and he to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask
the more" (Luke 12.47-48). To which the words of St. Theophylact of Bulgaria
are a fitting commentary: "Here some will object, saying: 'He who knows the
will of his Lord, but does not do it, is deservedly punished. But why is the
ignorant punished?' Because when he might have known he did not wish to
Or, as St. Cyril of Alexandria puts it: "How can he who did not know it be
guilty? The reason is, because he did not want to know it, although it was in
To whom does this distinction apply? St. Cyril applies it to false teachers and parents, on the one hand, and those who follow them, on
the other. In other words, the blind leaders will receive a greater condemnation than the blind followers - which is not to say, however, that they will not
Velimirovich writes: "Are the people at fault if godless elders and false
prophets lead them onto foreign paths? The people are not at fault to as great
an extent as their elders and the false prophets, but they are at fault to someextent. For God gave to the people also to know the right path, both through
their conscience and through the preaching of the word of God, so that people
should not blindly have followed their blind guides, who led them by false
Are Hindus and Buddhists who have lived their whole lives in non-
Christian communities wilfully ignorant of the truth? Of course, only God
knows the degree of ignorance in any particular case. However, even if the
heathen have more excuse than the Christians who deny Christ, they cannot
be said to be completely innocent; for no one is completely deprived of the
Thus St. Jerome writes: "Ours and every other race of men knows God
naturally. There are no peoples who do not recognise their Creator
And St. John Chrysostom writes: "From the beginning God
placed the knowledge of Himself in men, but the pagans awarded this knowledge to sticks and stones, doing wrong to the truth to the extent that
14 And the same Father writes: "One way of coming to the
knowledge of God is that which is provided by the whole of creation; and
another, no less significant, is that which is offered by conscience, the whole
of which we have expounded upon at greater length, showing how you have
a self-taught knowledge of what is good and what is not so good, and how
conscience urges all this upon you from within. Two teachers, then, are given
you from the beginning: creation and conscience. Neither of them has a voice
to speak out; yet they teach men in silence." (First Homily on Hannah)
Many have abandoned the darkness of idolatry by following the voices of
creation and conscience alone. Such, for example, was St. Barbara, who even
before she had heard of Christ rejected her father's idols and believed in the
One Creator of heaven and earth. For she heeded the voice of creation: "The
heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament proclaimeth the work of
His hands" (Psalm 18.1). And she heeded the voice of her conscience, which
recoiled from those "most odious works of witchcrafts, and wicked sacrifices;
and also those merciless murderers of children and devourers of man's flesh,
and the feasts of blood, with their priests out of the midst of their idolatrous
crew, and the parents, that killed with their own hands souls destitute of
help" (Wisdom of Solomon 12.4-6). But her father, who had the same
witnesses to the truth as she, rejected it - to the extent of killing his own
Thus there is a light that "enlightens every man who comes into the world"
(John 1.9). And if there are some who reject that light, abusing that freewill
which God will never deprive them of, this is not His fault, but theirs. As St.
John Chrysostom says, "If there are some who choose to close the eyes of their
mind and do not want to receive the rays of that light, their darkness comes
not from the nature of the light, but from their own darkness in voluntarily
This mystery of the voluntary rejection of the light was revealed in a vision
to a nun, the sister of the famous novelist Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy, who
rejected the teaching of the Orthodox Church and died under anathema:
"When I returned from the burial of my brother Sergius to my home in the
monastery, I had some kind of dream or vision which shook me to the depths
of my soul. After I had completed my usual cell rule, I began to doze off, or
fell into some kind of special condition between sleep and waking, which we
monastics call a light sleep. I dropped off, and beheld... It was night. There
was the study of Lev Nikolayevich. On the writing desk stood a lamp with a
dark lampshade. Behind the desk, and leaning with his elbows on it, sat Lev
Nikolayevich, and on his face there was the mark of such serious thought, and
such despair, as I had never seen in him before... The room was filled with a
thick, impenetrable darkness; the only illumination was of that place on the
table and on the face of Lev Nikolayevich on which the light of the lamp was
falling. The darkness in the room was so thick, so impenetrable, that it even
seemed as if it were filled, saturated with some materialisation... And
suddenly I saw the ceiling of the study open, and from somewhere in the
heights there began to pour such a blindingly wonderful light, the like of
which cannot be seen on earth; and in this light there appeared the Lord Jesus
Christ, in that form in which He is portrayed in Rome, in the picture of the
holy Martyr and Archdeacon Laurence: the all-pure hands of the Saviour
were spread out in the air above Lev Nikolayevich, as if removing from
invisible executioners the instruments of torture. It looks just like that in the
picture. And this ineffable light poured and poured onto Lev Nikolayevich.
But it was as if he didn't see it... And I wanted to shout to my brother:
Levushka, look, look up!... And suddenly, behind Lev Nikolayevich, - I saw it
with terror, - from the very thickness of the darkness I began to make out
another figure, a terrifying, cruel figure that made me tremble: and this figure,
placing both its hands from behind over the eyes of Lev Nikolayevich, shut
out that wonderful light from him. And I saw that my Levushka was making
despairing efforts to push away those cruel, merciless hands... At this point I
came to, and, as I came to, I heard a voice speaking as it were inside me: 'The
If the Light of Christ enlightens everyone, then there is no one who cannot
come to the True Faith, whatever his situation. If a man follows the teachers
given to everyone, creation and conscience, then the Providence of God, with
Whom "all things are possible" (Matthew 19.26), will lead him to the teacher
that is given at the beginning only to a few - "the Church of the living God,
the pillar and ground of the Truth" (I Timothy 3.15). For "it is not possible,"
writes St. John Chrysostom, "that one who is living rightly and freed from the
passions should ever be overlooked. But even if he happens to be in error,
This point was developed in an illuminating manner by Cassian's French
contemporary, Prosper of Aquitaine: "The very armies that exhaust the world
help on the work of Christian grace. How many indeed who in the quiet of
peacetime delayed to receive the sacrament of baptism, were compelled by
fear of close danger to hasten to the water of regeneration, and were suddenly
forced by threatening terror to fulfil a duty which a peaceful exhortation
failed to bring home to their slow and tepid souls? Some sons of the Church,
made prisoners by the enemy, changed their masters into servants of the
Gospel, and by teaching them the faith they became the superiors of their own
wartime lords. Again, some foreign pagans, whilst serving in the Roman
armies, were able to learn the faith in our country, when in their own lands
they could not have known it; they returned to their homes instructed in the
Christian religion. Thus nothing can prevent God's grace from accomplishing
His will... For all who at any time will be called and will enter into the
Kingdom of God, have been marked out in the adoption which preceded all
times. And just as none of the infidels is counted among the elect, so none of
the God-fearing is excluded from the blessed. For in fact God's prescience,
which is infallible, cannot lose any of the members that make up the fullness
However, there are few today who have a living faith in God's ability to
bring anyone to the faith, whatever his situation. It may therefore be useful to
cite the famous example of God's favour to the Aleuts of Alaska, to whom He
sent angels to teach them the Orthodox Faith in the absence of any human
instructor. Fr. John Veniaminov (later St. Innocent, metropolitan of Moscow
(+1879)) relates how, on his first missionary journey to Akun island, he found
all the islanders lined up on the shore waiting for him. It turned out that they
had been warned by their former shaman, John Smirennikov, who in turn had
been warned by two "white men", who looked like the angels on icons.
Smirennikov told his story to Fr. John, who wrote: "Soon after he was
baptised by Hieromonk Macarius, first one and later two spirits appeared to
him but were visible to no one else... They told him that they were sent by
God to edify, teach and guard him. For the next thirty years they appeared to
him almost every day, either during daylight hours or early in the evening -
but never at night. On these occasions: (1) They taught him in its totality
Christian theology and the mysteries of the faith... (2) In time of sickness and
famine they brought help to him and - though more rarely - to others at his
request. (When agreeing to his requests that they help others, they always
responded by saying that they would first have to ask God, and if it was His
will, then they would do it.) (3) Occasionally they told him of thing occurring
in another place or (very rarely) at some time in the future - but then only if
God willed such a revelation; in such cases they would persuade him that
they did so not by their own power, but by the power of Almighty God.
"Their doctrine is that of the Orthodox Church. I, however, knowing that
even demons believe - and tremble with fear [James 3.19], wondered whether
or not this might be the crafty and subtle snare of him who from time
immemorial has been Evil. 'How do they teach you to pray, to themselves or
to God? And how do they teach you to live with others?' He answered that
they taught him to pray not to them but to the Creator of all, and to pray in
spirit, with the heart; occasionally they would even pray along with him for
"They taught him to exercise all pure Christian virtues (which he related to
me in detail), and recommended, furthermore, that he remain faithful and
pure, both within and outside of marriage (this perhaps because the locals are
quite given to such impurity). Furthermore, they taught him all the outward
Very apt was the comment of one of the first who read this story: "It is
comforting to read about such miraculous Divine Providence towards
savages, sons of Adam who,
though forgotten by the world, were not forgotten by
These cases lead us to draw the following conclusions: (1) The Providence
of God is able to save
anyone in any situation, providing he loves the truth.
Therefore (2), although we cannot declare with categorical certainty that those
who die in unbelief or heresy will be damned, neither can we declare that
they will be saved because of their ignorance; for they may be alienated from
God "through the ignorance that is in them,
because of the blindness of their
heart
" (Ephesians 4.18), and not simply through the ignorance that is caused
by external circumstances. And (3) if we, who know the truth, say that such
people do not need to become Christians in order to be saved, then we shall
be guilty of indifference to the truth; for which we shall certainly merit
damnation. For while we cannot presume to know the eternal destinies ofindividual men, we do know this, that the Word of God is true that declares:
"He that believeth and is baptised shall be saved; but he that believeth not
shall be damned" (Mark 16.16). And again: "Except a man be born of water
and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God" (John 3.5). And
again: "Whosoever shall deny Me before men, him will I also deny before My
Moreover, to the unlying Word of God we may add the witness of Holy
Tradition, in the form of the experience of Theodora, the spiritual daughter of
St. Basil the New, who, after passing through the toll-houses and being
returned to her body, was told by the angels: "Those who believe in the Holy
Trinity and take as frequently as possible the Holy Communion of the Holy
Mysteries of Christ, our Saviour's body and Blood - such people can rise to
heaven directly, with no hindrances, and the holy angels defend them, and
the holy saints of God pray for their salvation, since they have lived
righteously. No one, however, takes care of wicked and depraved heretics,
who do nothing useful during their lives, and live in disbelief and heresy. The
angels can say nothing in their defence... [Only those] enlightened by the faith
and holy baptism can rise and be tested in the stations of torment [that is, the
toll-houses]. The unbelievers do not come here. Their souls belong to hell
even before they part from their bodies. When they die, the devils take their
souls with no need to test them. Such souls are their proper prey, and they
Some believe that even those condemned to hell after their death, may yet
get a “second chance” at the Last Judgement, through the prayers of the saints
and the Mother of God. The present writer knows no patristic witness that
would clearly confirm or refute such an idea. However, we know from St.
Simeon the Theologian that
if a man is making progress towards the truth in this
life he will not be deprived of further progress in the life to come
: "It is a great good
thing to believe in Christ, because without faith in Christ it is impossible to be
saved; but one must also be instructed in the word of truth and understand it.
It is a good thing to be instructed in the word of truth, and to understand it is
essential; but one must also receive Baptism in the name of the Holy and Lifegiving
Trinity, for the bringing to life of the soul. It is a good thing to receive
Baptism and through it a new spiritual life; but it is necessary that this
mystical life, or this mental enlightenment in the spirit, also should be
consciously felt. It is a good thing to receive with feeling the mental
enlightenment in the spirit; but one must manifest also the works of light. It is
a good thing to do the works of light; but one must also be clothed in the
humility and meekness of Christ for a perfect likeness to Christ. He who
attains this and becomes meek and humble of heart, as if these were his
natural dispositions, will unfailingly enter into the Kingdom of Heaven and
into the joy of the Lord. Moreover, regarding all those who are running on the
path of God according to the order I have indicated, if it happens that natural death should cut off their course in the midst of this, they will not be banished from the doors of the Kingdom of God, and these doors will not be closed before them, according to the limitless mercy of God. But regarding those who do not run in such a way, their faith also in Christ the Lord is vain, if
4. The Argument from the Supremacy of Love over Justice.
"Let us supposethat most men are not worthy to enter the Kingdom of heaven, if only because
they will find nothing akin to their own corrupted nature there. Nevertheless,
God is love, and he would never cast the creatures He has created and still
continues to love into the unimaginably terrible torments of hell, whose
purpose, since they are unending, cannot be the rehabilitation of the sinner,
nor deterrence of future evil. We do not deny that the Scriptures speak in
many places of the existence of just such a hell, and of a great multitude
entering into it. But we cannot but hope and believe (for 'love believeth all
things, hopeth all things' (I Corinthians 13.7) that these images are placed
before us simply as a deterrent, and that in the end hell will be an empty place,
not only spiritually but also physically. God has shown, by His Death on the
Cross, that His love for us is greater than His love for the abstract principle of
justice. Is it possible that he would finally deny that, admit that His Sacrifice
had been in vain (for the great majority of people, at any rate), and allow cold
justice to triumph over love?"
In attempting to answer this objection, we must first arm ourselves with
the most basic weapon of the Christian life:
the fear of God. The fear of God is
not an abject trembling before a despotic tyrant. It is a rational, heartfelt
awareness that we all, and every part of our lives, are in the hands of a Being
Who infinitely transcends everything that we can say about Him, and even
the very categories of our discourse. This applies not only to clearly
inexplicable and unimaginable acts of His such as the creation of the world
out of nothing. It also applies to those definitions of His nature which seem to
correspond to something in our experience, such as: "God is love".
If human love sometimes seems incompatible with justice, this is not so
with Divine love. For what is the whole economy of God’s incarnation, life on
earth and death on the Cross if not
perfect love in pursuit of perfect justice - an
extraordinary, paradoxical, but for that very reason characteristically Divine
justice? For He, the Just One, Who committed no sin and had done everything
to deter us from it, out of love for man died to blot out all the sins and
injustices of the whole world. When we could not pay the price, He paid it for
us; when we were dead in sin, He died to give us life; "for Christ hath once
suffered for sins, the just for the unjust" (I Peter 3.18).
The Church has expressed the paradoxicality of God’s justice with great
eloquence: "Come, all ye peoples, and let us venerate the blessed Wood,
through which the eternal justice has been brought to pass. For he who by a
tree deceived our forefather Adam, is by the Cross himself deceived; and he
who by tyranny gained possession of the creature endowed by God with
royal dignity, is overthrown in headlong fall. By the Blood of God the poison
of the serpent is washed away; and the curse of a just condemnation is loosed
by the just punishment inflicted on the Just. For it was fitting that wood
should be healed by wood, and that through the Passion of One Who knew
not passion should be remitted all the sufferings of him who was condemned
because of wood. But glory to Thee, O Christ our King, for Thy dread
dispensation towards us, whereby Thou hast saved us all, for Thou art good
Here there is no contradiction between love and justice. And if there is no
contradiction between them in the Redeeming Passion of Christ on the Cross,
then there is likewise no contradiction between them in His Coming again to
judge men in accordance with their response to His Passion. But in order to
understand this it is necessary, first, to rid ourselves of the idea that God’s just
wrath against impenitent sinners is comparable to the sinful human passion
of vengefulness. Such vengefulness is condemned by the Word of God
(Romans 12.17-21), and cannot possibly be attributed to the Divine Nature,
which is alien to all fallen human passion. We must at all times hate the sin
and not the sinner; we must wish for the destruction of sin and not of sinners.
If we wish to identify our will with the Will of God, then our first desire must
be for the salvation of all sinners, including our enemies, paying special
attention (lest we become hypocrites) to those sinners we know best and for
whom we are primarily responsible - ourselves.
The wrath of God,” writes Archbishop Theophan of Poltava, “is one of the
manifestations of the love of God,
moral evil in the heart of rational creatures in general, and of man in
particular." ("On the Redemption"; quoted in Fr. Anthony Chernov, Archevêque
That is why the martyrs under the heavenly altar, filled as they
are with the love of God to the highest degree, are at the same time filled with
a holy wrath: “How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost Thou not judge and
avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?” (Revelation 6.10). And yet,
as the Venerable Bede writes, "the souls of the righteous cry out these words,
not out of hatred for enemies, but out of love for justice". (On Genesis 4.10)
This love of justice is natural to man, for it is made in the image of God’s
own love of justice. The love of justice proceeds naturally from the Nature of
God, like heat from the sun. Thus to say that God should be loving but not
just is like saying that the sun should give light but not heat. It is simply not
in the nature of things. What is in accordance with the nature of God is that
He should divide the light of His grace from its fiery heat at the Last
Judgement, giving the light only to the blessed and the heat only to the
damned.
As St. Basil the Great writes, commenting on the verse: “The voice of the
Lord divideth the flame of fire” (Psalm 28.6), writes: “The fire prepared in
punishment for the devil and his angels is divided by the voice of the Lord.
Thus, since there are two capacities in fire, one of burning and the other of
illuminating, the fierce and punitive property of the fire may await those who
deserve to burn, while its illuminating and radiant part may be reserved for
The Lord placed justice on a par with mercy and faith (Matthew 23.23), and
it was the Ephesian Church’s hatred of injustice that redeemed it in His eyes;
for “this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also
hate” (Revelation 2.6). This lesson is particularly important for our century,
when the Orthodox Church has been persecuted by the ecumenists with their
indifference to the truth, on the one hand, and the sergianists with their
indifference to justice, on the other. We have to kindle in ourselves a holy and
Thus, as Archbishop Theophan writes in reply to the question “Can one
have a negative feeling in relation to the enemies of the Russian people and
the Orthodox Church or must one suppress in oneself this feeling, repeating
the words: ‘Vengeance is Mine, I will repay’?”: “To have a negative feeling
towards the enemies of God and of the Russian people is natural. And on the
contrary not to have a negative feeling is unnatural. Only this feeling must be
correct. And it will be correct when it has a principled, not personal character,
that is, when we 'hate' the enemies of God and of the Russian people not for
their personal offences against us, but for their hostile attitude towards God
and the Church and for their inhuman attitude towards Russian people.
Therefore it is also necessary to fight with these enemies. Whereas if we do
not fight, we will be punished by God for our lukewarmness. He will then
The whole burden of the Old Testament Prophets was an impassioned, yet
holy lament against the injustice of man against God and against his fellow
man. And if anything to the Prophets was proof of the corruption of Israel, it
was that, instead of repenting of their own injustice, they accused the Just One
of injustice. Thus the holy Prophet Ezekiel laments: “The house of Israel saith,
The way of the Lord is not equal. O house of Israel, are not My ways equal?
Are not your ways unequal? Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel,
every one according to his ways, saith the Lord God.” (Ezekiel 18.29-30). And
the holy Prophet Malachi laments: “Ye have wearied the Lord with your
words. Yet ye say, Wherein have we wearied Him? When ye say, Every one
that doeth evil is good in the sight of the Lord, and He delighteth in them; or,
The God of judgement is within us, manifest in that extraordinarily
powerful love of justice that is created in the image of God’s love of justice.
Faith teaches, and human nature cries out for, a last and most glorious
Judgement in which all tears will wiped away from every innocent face
(Revelation 21.4), and every apparently meaningless suffering will find its
meaning and reward. Again, faith teaches, and human nature cries out for, a
last and most terrible Judgement in which those who laughed over the
sufferings of others will weep (Luke 6.25), and those who feasted on human
flesh will gnash their teeth in eternal frustration. "Be not deceived; God is not
mocked; for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. For he that
soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the
Thus the Last, Most Terrible Judgement is a mystery proclaimed by the
Word of God and grounded in the deepest reality of things. It both proceeds
from the nature of God Himself, and is an innate demand of our human
nature created in the image of God. It is the essential foundation for the
practice of virtue and the abhorrence of vice, and the ultimate goal to which
the whole of created nature strives, willingly or unwillingly, as to its natural
fulfilment. Without it all particular judgements would have a partial and
unsatisfactory character, and the reproaches of Job against God, and of all
unbelievers against faith, would be justified. And if the Last Judgement is
different from all preceding ones in that in it love seems to be separated from
justice, love being distributed exclusively to the righteous and justice to the
sinners, then this is because human nature itself will have divided itself in
two, one part having responded to love with love, to justice with justice, while
the other, having rejected both the love and the justice of God, will merit to
And if, like Ivan in Dostoyevsky’s novel,
The Brothers Karamazov, we still
cannot come to terms with the tears of an innocent child, this is not because
our love is too great, but because our faith in God's justice is too small. God’s
ways are not our ways, His thoughts are not our thoughts, and His justice, we
must humbly accept, is not our justice. At some times we cannot understand
why the innocent suffer; at others – why the guilty get away with it. At some
times we cannot understand why great sinners are forgiven in a moment; at
others – why those who seem to us to be less guilty appear destined for the
eternal fire. The only right way to respond to this is to recognise humbly that
the creature cannot and must not argue with his Creator, and to say with the
Psalmist: “Righteous art Thou, O Lord, and upright are Thy judgements”
(Psalm 118.137)…
Back to All Articles